Workers Compensation |
Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ) |
Mesothelioma |
Last Employer Rule |
James R. McAllister worked
as a shipyard carpenter in the Portland, Oregon area in 1956, first for
Willamette Iron & Steel Co. (WISCO) and then for Albina Engine & Machine
(Albina). He moved to Seattle, Washington in 1957 and worked in a similar
capacity for the predecessor company to Lockheed Shipbuilding (Lockheed) until
he ceased his maritime employment in 1960. He died of mesothelioma in 2002. His
widow filed a claim for death benefits under the United States Longshore and
Harbor Workers Act against, Lockheed, Albina, and WISCO.
All parties stipulated that
McAllister's injuries occurred while he was at maritime sites, that his death
was due to mesothelioma caused by exposure to asbestos, and that the examining
pathologist would testify that any level of exposure to asbestos can cause
mesothelioma. The main issue to be addressed was which employer should be
liable for payment of benefits. The first two hearings before Administrative
Law Judges (ALJs) at the Benefits Review Board (BRB) found Lockheed liable,
while the next two remands on appeal found Albina liable.
The BRB cited previous case
law that held that, when a claim is made against multiple employers, the law
requires the ALJ to weigh the evidence for all potentially liable employers to
determine the one that is liable. "Each employer bears the same burden of
providing that the claimant was not exposed to injurious stimuli at that
employer in sufficient quantities to cause his disease, or that the claimant
was exposed to injurious stimuli while working for a subsequent covered
employer. If no employer manages to persuade the ALJ that its evidence is
'entitled to greater weight,' then the ALJ should assign liability to the
claimant's last employer."
WISCO admitted that
McAllister was exposed to asbestos while employed there but the ALJ noted that
the asbestos exposure at Lockheed was weaker. This was the reason that the
first two ALJs determined that Lockheed had "met its burden of showing th
absence of exposure." Since McAllister worked for Albina after WISCO, it
was determined that Albina was liable.
On appeal, Albina argued
that the ALJs misapplied the "last employer rule," and that they did
not analyze the evidence separately and sequentially, with the most recent
employer analyzed first, and with liability assigned to the first-analyzed
employer found to be responsible.
The Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals held as follows in occupational disease cases involving multiple
employers:
Using this analysis, the
court found that Lockheed was the last responsible employer and is liable for
the payment of benefits. This is because it was McAllister's last employer and
could not rebut the evidence that he was exposed to asbestos at the time he
worked for the company. Albina's petition was granted and the ALJ's decisions at
the BRB reversed.
United States Court of
Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Albina Engine & Machine; Fireman's Fund Insurance
Co., Petitioners, v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs;
Benefits BRB Review Board; Karen McAllister, Widow of James R. McAllister;
Lockheed Shipbuilding and Wausau Insurance Company; Wilamette Iron & Steel
Co.; Saif Corporation, Respondents. No 09-70592. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7,
2010. Filed Dec. 10, 2010. ---F.3d---2010 WL 5029538 (C.A.9)